Monday, July 09, 2007

We are told that your government provided $2.5 million to this training program in 2005 and 2006, which the US House of Representatives seeks to block in future. While the ban on such aid would not have even the slightest impact on a rich country like Saudi Arabia, what bothers me is the argument advanced in justifying such a ban

Saudi Businessman Blasts US Double Standard
Javid Hassan, Arab News

RIYADH, 8 July 2007 — Blasting the United States for its double standard in the Middle East policy, a Saudi businessman has said that while the country has a department of public diplomacy to try to undo the damage done to its image as a result of its wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, it persists in its pro-Israeli tilt along with a hostile attitude toward Muslims.

This is one of the points raised by Turki Faisal Al-Rasheed, chairman of Riyadh-based Golden Grass Inc., an agricultural company, in a letter sent to all US congressmen. A copy of the letter was also received by Arab News.

Al-Rasheed, who also runs two websites, wrote to the congressmen in the context of the recent House of Representatives vote prohibiting any aid to Saudi Arabia. The legislation calls for a blockage of any further financial assistance extended by the US government.

His letter to the congressmen comes at a time when US Undersecretary for Public Diplomacy Karen Hughes invited 24 women from Harvard University in the United States and Jeddah-based Dar Al-Hekma College who met in Jordan recently to take part in a “Habitat for Humanity” building project.

The joint effort, called the “Hekma-Harvard Women Build”, provided an opportunity for women from both cultures not only to help build two homes in the community of Ghor Al-Safi, but also to exchange ideas and experiences through this unique international project.

The two groups were linked initially through a teleconference by Hughes who visited Dar Al-Hekma College in 2005. Eager to find a way to link women in Saudi Arabia with their counterparts in the US, Hughes’ office contacted Harvard University, where the idea for the joint build was circulated to students at the John F. Kennedy School of Government. Habitat for Humanity became involved when Hughes’ office contacted Habitat for Humanity International in Washington, DC.

Such an initiative to enhance its public image in the Middle East, it is pointed out, is nullified by its blatantly pro-Israeli Middle East policy and its continued moves toward pre-emptive strikes against states deemed hostile to US interests. Iraq was one of the victims of such invasion waged on a false pretext.

In his letter, Al-Rasheed said: “We are told that your government provided $2.5 million to this training program in 2005 and 2006, which the US House of Representatives seeks to block in future. While the ban on such aid would not have even the slightest impact on a rich country like Saudi Arabia, what bothers me is the argument advanced in justifying such a ban.”

The letter has provoked strong comments, both for and against, from the congressmen.

Al-Rasheed said that “when we talk of religious intolerance, the US, unfortunately, projects a poor image of a country that has become increasingly intolerant of Islam and symbols identified with this faith.”

In this context, he quotes the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) “which has documented numerous cases of Muslims being harassed in the US, mosques damaged, women in veil being humiliated, and others discriminated against in schools and offices on grounds of their religious belief. No one ever hears of any gentleman wearing a skull cap being the subject of individual or media attention.”

Referring to the charge of religious intolerance, he said congressmen have to remember that Saudi Arabia is the home of the Islamic world’s two holiest mosques.

“Its position is similar to that of the Vatican, which is the seat of the Catholic world. I do not think that nuns in Rome or anywhere else in the world, including Muslim countries, would ever invite hostile attention for moving about with their faces covered. After all, such an appendage is part of their faith, which they must practice.”

http://www.arabnews.com/?page=4&section=0&article=93300&d=8&m=7&y=2007


Thursday, February 15, 2007

GGI is set to divert from the agriculture business to the intricate world of real estate. Al-Rasheed said that most entrepreneurs in the Kingdom as well as in other countries mortgage their houses to generate funds if they hit upon a business idea.

Arab News

Tuesday, 13, February, 2007 (25, Muharram, 1428)

GGI Seeks Changes in Real Estate Industry Regulations

Rodolfo C. Estimo Jr.,

RIYADH, 13 February 2007 — The local real estate industry has bright prospects but the existing regulatory rule has to be changed or amended, according to Turki Faisal Al-Rasheed, CEO of Golden Grass, Inc. (GGI) which is ranked among the Kingdom’s top 100 companies.

“The real estate industry in the Kingdom has been on the uptrend. In fact, it’s a huge market with bright prospects. We’re expecting a $50 billion worth of real estate development annually for the next 20 years but this would materialize only if the government has to change or amend the existing regulatory rule,” he told Arab News.

GGI is set to divert from the agriculture business to the intricate world of real estate. Al-Rasheed said that most entrepreneurs in the Kingdom as well as in other countries mortgage their houses to generate funds if they hit upon a business idea. In this connection, he said, there’s a problem in Saudi Arabia because if a Saudi has a lien on his house, he cannot have a second or even a third mortgage on his property, adding that to purchase a second or third mortgage on a house is important to generate cash for business expansion.

“ At present, there are 650,000 housing units being constructed by the government. A Saudi national is allowed to borrow up to SR300,000 to avail of these houses for his family but he cannot sell or mortgage the property to raise capital for business expansion because of the existing regulation,” he said. He added that the government should remove the barriers to business growth and allow the sale of a property with a lien as well as allow a second or third mortgage to a property with a first lien so that the owner can generate cash for business growth.

Asked if something is being done, or has been done, to remove the barriers he was referring to, he said, “Yes. We’re thankful that the government has taken a positive view of our complaints. The Shoura Council said that it will form a government organization similar to the Supreme Commission for Tourism in the tourism sector to solve the problems of the local real estate industry.”

http://www.arabnews.com/?page=6§ion=0&article=92104&d=13&m=2&y=2007


Copyright: Arab News © 2003 All rights reserved. Site designed by: arabix and powered by Eima IT

Saturday, February 10, 2007

The term greenhouse effect is used to describe the warming effect that certain gases have on the temperature of the earth's atmosphere under normal conditions.


Facts on Global Warming (Part 1)

Posted by Imran H Khan on Feb 11, 2007, 06:01


Global warming (also called the greenhouse effect) describes the gradual increase of the air temperature in the earth's lower atmosphere.

Why is this called the Greenhouse Effect?

A greenhouse is made entirely of glass. When sunlight (shortwave radiation) strikes the glass, most of it passes through and warms up the plants, soil and air inside the greenhouse. As these objects warm up they give off heat, but these heat waves have a much longer wavelength than the incoming rays from the sun. This longwave radiation cannot easily pass through glass; it is re-radiated into the greenhouse, causing everything in it to heat up.

The term greenhouse effect is used to describe the warming effect that certain gases have on the temperature of the earth's atmosphere under normal conditions.

Sunlight (shortwave radiation) passes easily through the earth's atmosphere. Once it strikes and warms the earth's surface, longwave radiation is given off and goes back into the atmosphere. While some of this longwave radiation or heat escapes into space, most of it is absorbed or held by carbon dioxide and other gases that exist in small quantities in the atmosphere. Thus these gases form a `blanket' that keeps the earth an average of 33 degrees centigrade warmer than it would be if this greenhouse effect did not occur. Without these gases the whole planet would be an icy wasteland with an average temperature of 16 degrees centigrade below freezing!

Human population growth and related industrial expansion, have led to greater air pollution and a change in the composition of the earth's atmosphere. Some pollutants enhance the natural greenhouse effect, resulting in increased global atmospheric temperatures.

The gases that are responsible for the increase in the greenhouse effect are:

Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the pollutant most responsible for increased global warming. It is released into the atmosphere mainly through burning of fossil fuels (e.g. coal, petrol, diesel). In addition, widespread destruction of natural vegetation, particularly forests, has contributed to increased atmospheric CO2 levels (. This has occurred for two reasons. First, plants take up CO2 through the process of photosynthesis. The destruction of vegetation, as occurs in deforestation, reduces the amount of CO2 that is removed from the atmosphere. Second, when forests are cleared, and burnt or left to rot, CO2 is released.

Methane (CH4) has doubled in concentration, mainly as a result of agricultural activities, between 1750 and 1990.

Nitrous oxide (N2O), also a product of burning fossil fuel, has increased by 8% over the same period.
Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), in addition to damaging the ozone layer, are potent greenhouse gases. Their concentrations in the atmosphere are increasing by about 4% every year.

Therefore, the average global temperature is about 0,5 degrees centigrade warmer than it was 100 years ago. Snow and ice-cover has decreased this century, deep ocean temperatures have increased, and cloud cover over North America has also increased over this period. The latter indicates increased atmospheric water vapor. Over the last century, global sea levels have risen by between 100 mm and 200 mm. Rising sea levels cause water to expand as it warms and glaciers melt, adding water to the oceans, thus scientists expect widespread flooding of coastal areas as sea levels rise. If current pollution trends continue, scientists conclude that the earth could probably be about 1 degree centigrade warmer by 2025 and 3 degrees centigrade warmer by 2100.

This rapid temperature rise could have several effects:

"There maybe a greater frequency and scale of extreme weather conditions, e.g. drought and flood as being experience by most regions of the world.
"Changes in the distribution of disease-bearing organisms so that people, domestic animals, and crops might be exposed to diseases previously absent from an area.
"These changes in global temperature, although apparently small, could cause very large changes in climate. For example, the last Ice Age, which ended approximately 15 000 years ago, was only 5 degrees centigrade colder than current temperatures, but the resulting climate changes were massive: most of North America was covered in a layer of ice about 1,5 km thick.
Although I am not an expert on the issue the aforementioned facts make incredible reading and this is just the basic stuff. Therefore, in conclusion to this part I can honestly say the facts are worrying and a definite cause for concern. The facts I have quoted are readily available on any number of given reputable websites and books. The analysis I provide here is not an opinion or personal point of view but facts. Thus in order to truly understand the issue one must observe and correlate the entire picture of human civilization on Earth. Next week I examine the political, social and economic hurdles that have contributed to the Global Warming effect and the steps required to negotiate with this grave concern that affects the whole of humanity now and for future generations.

Facts and statistics obtained from:
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change;
Institute for Biodiversity and Conservation;
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
http://www.canyon-news.com/artman/publish/article_5274.php